When working with logic in discrete math appliations there are a plethora of rules you can use for working with the well formed formulas. Remembering them all can be a daunting task, which is why I like to have a cheat sheet available. As such, here’s a simple one that I like to use when working with these problems.

## Equivalence Rules#

ExpressionEquivalent ToName of the Rule
$$P \lor Q$$$$Q \lor P$$Commutative - comm.
$$P \land Q$$$$Q \land P$$Commutative - comm.
$$\left(P\lor Q\right)\lor R$$$$P \lor\left(Q\lor R\right)$$Associative - ass.
$$\left(P\land Q\right)\land R$$$$P\land\left(Q\land R\right)$$Associative - ass.
$$\left(P\lor Q\right)'$$$$P'\land Q'$$DeMorgan’s Law
$$\left(P\land Q\right)'$$$$P'\lor Q'$$DeMorgan’s Law
$$P\rightarrow Q$$$$P'\lor Q$$Implication - imp.
$$P$$$$\left(P'\right)'$$Double Negation - dn.
$$P\iff Q$$$$\left(P\rightarrow Q\right)\land\left(Q\rightarrow P\right)$$Definition of Equivalence - equ.

## Inference Rules#

ExpressionCan DeriveName of the Rule
$$P,\ P\rightarrow Q$$$$Q$$Modus Ponens - mp.
$$P\rightarrow Q,\ Q'$$$$P'$$Modus Tollens - mt.
$$P,\ Q$$$$P\land Q$$Conjunction - con.
$$P\land Q$$$$P,\ Q$$Simplification - simp.
$$P$$$$P\lor Q$$Addition - add.
$$P\rightarrow Q,\ Q\rightarrow R$$$$P\rightarrow R$$Hypothetical Syllogism - hs
$$P\lor Q,\ P'$$$$Q$$Disjunctive Syllogism - ds.
$$P\rightarrow Q$$$$Q'\rightarrow P'$$Contraposition - cont.
$$Q'\rightarrow P'$$$$P\rightarrow Q$$Contraposition - cont.
$$P$$$$P\land P$$Self Reference - self.
$$P\lor P$$$$P$$Self Reference - self.
$$\left(P\land Q\right)\rightarrow R$$$$P\rightarrow\left(Q\rightarrow R\right)$$Exportation - exp.
$$P,\ P'$$$$Q$$Inconsistency - inc.

## Derivation Rules#

The general workflow for using derivation rules is:

• Strip off the quantifiers
• Work with the independent well formed formulas
• Insert the quantifiers back in

Universal Instantiation – ui.:

From $$\left(\forall x\right)P\left(x\right)$$ we can deduce $$P\left(t\right)$$

Note: t must not already appear as a variable in the expression for

$$P(x)$$

Existential Instantiation – ei.:

From

$$\left(\exists x\right)P\left(x\right)$$ we can deduce $$P\left(t\right)$$

Note: t must be introduced for the first time. As such, you will want to do these early in proofs.

Universal Generalization – ug.:

From

$$P\left(x\right)$$ we can deduce $$\left(\forall x\right)P\left(x\right)$$

Notes:

• P(x) hasn’t been deduced by existential instantiation from any hypothesis in which x was a free variable.
• P(x) hasn’t been deduced by existential instantiation from another wff in which x was a free variable.

Existential Generalization – eg.:

From

$$P\left(a\right)$$ we can deduce $$\left(\exists x\right)P\left(x\right)$$

Note: x must not appear in

$$P(a)$$